PDA

View Full Version : Non-DOD #'s


knee_dragger
03-04-2009, 01:58 PM
Got done with some upgrades last week and finally got the time to post. This is the New Era Non-DOD cam package,New Era CAI, Precision Torque Convertor 2800, Powerbond Harmonic Balancer 25%, 160 Thermo, Kooks LTH, Kooks catted X-Pipe.
Install was done at Tune Time Performance in Toms River,NJ. I can't say enough about the Matt and his crew! Matt took the time to go over everything with me and make changes to make sure I was completely satisfied. Anyone in NJ looking to get some work done should definitely give them a call. The car runs great! The only problem now is traction, punch it at anything less than 40mph and I'm sideways.

Hopefully next Supercharger & some sticky tires! :woohoo:

Here are the numbers. Sorry scan is hugh. Tried to resize on photobucket.

http://i402.photobucket.com/albums/pp110/knee_dragger750/dyno3.jpg
fiveoh
03-04-2009, 02:02 PM
Is it just me or is the pic too small to read? What where your numbers?
knee_dragger
03-04-2009, 02:10 PM
Is it just me or is the pic too small to read? What where your numbers?

Not you have to fix in a few minutes when I get back home. 407hp 354tq
VegasNate
03-04-2009, 02:28 PM
Awesome Dude! Very similar to my results. I see a Magnacharger in your future too........
r33pwrd
03-04-2009, 02:29 PM
was this cam designed for NA or forced induction? good numbners either way!
fiveoh
03-04-2009, 02:30 PM
Not you have to fix in a few minutes when I get back home. 407hp 354tq


Nice hp would have expected the TQ to be a little higher. Does having a converter throw off tq numbers on a dyno?
-Ray-
03-04-2009, 02:35 PM
I don't understand the torque number. My dyno at Livernois was 368 torque, and I still have the stock cam.
GeorgeInNePa
03-04-2009, 03:00 PM
The torque looks very low.

Did you mean to type an "8"?
Blackdevil77
03-04-2009, 03:01 PM
Ditto on the torque but hp numbers are awsome! Also, before cam work, tq and hp numbers seem to be the same, maybe torque a little higher. Why after these cams is the hp number always higher than the tq numbers? Not even just by a few. A good 20 to 40 lb ft?
-Ray-
03-04-2009, 03:14 PM
Might be because the valve train is lighter.
knee_dragger
03-04-2009, 03:20 PM
The torque looks very low.

Did you mean to type an "8"?

No that's the right number. Have to rescan the dyno sheet at work tomorrow. It's still too small to see. I'm not sure about the TQ number being low, have to check on that.
knee_dragger
03-04-2009, 03:23 PM
was this cam designed for NA or forced induction? good numbners either way!

Thanks, I was told that the cam would work good with forced induction.
Mike@NewEra
03-04-2009, 05:54 PM
He has a 2800 rpm converter, and Matt did the dyno pulls unlocked which makes the dyno numbers down around 30+ hp and tq at the wheels. With a descent tire, that is an easy 11 second car in the 1/4 mile, make sure you put up your track times when you go! This cam works well N/A and also very well with a supercharger, it was originally designed for a supercharger but we have had many applications with excellent results N/A with the L92 heads.
knee_dragger
03-04-2009, 05:56 PM
He has a 2800 rpm converter, and Matt did the dyno pulls unlocked which makes the dyno numbers down around 30+ hp and tq at the wheels. With a descent tire, that is an easy 11 second car in the 1/4 mile, make sure you put up your track times when you go! This cam works well N/A and also very well with a supercharger, it was originally designed for a supercharger but we have had many applications with excellent results N/A with the L92 heads.

Thanks for clearing that up Mike. Now tell Matt to hurry up and sell me his supercharger!!