Periodic
12-12-2012, 06:33 AM
So having spent the last month searching and reading, ive decided to make my own thread amd get some specific opinions.
For starters, I have decided to go with the VMR V701, gunmetal 19". Simple.
Now comes some math.
A 19x8.5 rim et35;
Width = 216mm
Centerline = 108mm
Offset = 35mm
Therefore, front face of wheel to hub is 73mm. [216-(108+35)]
A 19x9.5 rim et45;
Widtg =241mm
Centerline = 120.5mm
Offsey = 45mm
Therefore, front face of wheel to hub is 75.5mm.
[241-(120.5+45)]
so..as for looks...both wheels should have the same amount of concavity to them.
Now throw on the 275 width tire.
On the 8.5" rim.
Tire width = 275mm
Wheel width = 216mm
Theoretical tire beyond rim face is 29.5mm. [(275-216)/2]. So, theoretically about 1-3/16".
On the 9.5" rim.
Tire width = 275mm
Wheel width = 241mm
Theoretical tire beyond rim face is 17mm. [(275-241)/2]. So, theoretically about 11/16".
Heres where I am in the fence, my gut feeling is that a 9.5 rim wont be protected enough from the tire. I hate the look when a rim looks too wide for a tire. Perhaps some of you could post some nearly perpendicular pictures of your tires to give me any idea. My thoughts are that some people are throwing 275s on stock 8" wheel, therefore the extra 1/2" width will only sit to improve how the tire is seated.
And from what I can tell, it wont look all that different to have staggered with those offsets. 2mm difference from face of wheel to hub. The bulk of the width is towards the center of the car.
Appreciate the input!
Sent from my Galaxy Note II using Tapatalk 2.
For starters, I have decided to go with the VMR V701, gunmetal 19". Simple.
Now comes some math.
A 19x8.5 rim et35;
Width = 216mm
Centerline = 108mm
Offset = 35mm
Therefore, front face of wheel to hub is 73mm. [216-(108+35)]
A 19x9.5 rim et45;
Widtg =241mm
Centerline = 120.5mm
Offsey = 45mm
Therefore, front face of wheel to hub is 75.5mm.
[241-(120.5+45)]
so..as for looks...both wheels should have the same amount of concavity to them.
Now throw on the 275 width tire.
On the 8.5" rim.
Tire width = 275mm
Wheel width = 216mm
Theoretical tire beyond rim face is 29.5mm. [(275-216)/2]. So, theoretically about 1-3/16".
On the 9.5" rim.
Tire width = 275mm
Wheel width = 241mm
Theoretical tire beyond rim face is 17mm. [(275-241)/2]. So, theoretically about 11/16".
Heres where I am in the fence, my gut feeling is that a 9.5 rim wont be protected enough from the tire. I hate the look when a rim looks too wide for a tire. Perhaps some of you could post some nearly perpendicular pictures of your tires to give me any idea. My thoughts are that some people are throwing 275s on stock 8" wheel, therefore the extra 1/2" width will only sit to improve how the tire is seated.
And from what I can tell, it wont look all that different to have staggered with those offsets. 2mm difference from face of wheel to hub. The bulk of the width is towards the center of the car.
Appreciate the input!
Sent from my Galaxy Note II using Tapatalk 2.